MCDM based on Trapezoidal Neutrosophic Numbers for Biogas Recovery Substrates Selection Problems

Authors

  • Norzanah Abd Rahman Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA Sabah Branch, Kota Kinabalu Campus, Sabah, Malaysia. https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8410-0819
  • Rafidah Selaman Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA Sabah Branch, Kota Kinabalu Campus, Sabah, Malaysia
  • Zamali Tarmudi Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA Johor Branch, Segamat Campus, Johor, Malaysia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0344-737X
  • Nor Hashimah Sulaiman Centre of Foundation Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor Branch, Dengkil Campus, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56532/mjsat.v6i1.538

Keywords:

Fuzzy Set, Neutrosophic Set, Trapezoidal Neutrosophic Numbers, Multi-Criteria Decision Making method, Biogas Recovery

Abstract

In the context of decision-making under uncertainty, fuzzy set theory has been extensively applied to model imprecise and ambiguous information. However, the absence of a falsity membership function limits its ability to fully capture the complexities of uncertain data. Neutrosophic Set (NS) theory addresses this limitation by introducing the truth, indeterminacy, and falsity functions, enabling a more comprehensive representation of uncertain, indeterminate, and inconsistent information. Despite the theoretical advancements of NS theory, its application in scientific decision-making remains limited. To bridge this gap, this paper proposes a Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method based on Trapezoidal Neutrosophic Numbers to effectively address the uncertainty associated with substrate selection for biogas recovery. The result shows that among five biogas substrates, Palm Oil Mill Effluent Sludge is the most suitable substrates for biogas with a score of 1.4316. This is followed by Palm Oil Mill Effluent with a score of 1.0868, Carbohydrate-Rich Food Waste with 0.9081, Protein-Rich Food Waste with 0.7868, and Fiber-Rich Food Waste with 0.7410. In addition, the sensitivity analysis shows that the ranking remains stable under input variations, while comparative analysis confirms the robustness and consistency of the proposed methodology against existing approaches. These findings demonstrate that the MCDM based on Trapezoidal Neutrosophic Numbers offers a structured and reliable framework for handling uncertainty, offering practical value to decision-makers in biogas recovery and similar domains.

Author Biography

  • Nor Hashimah Sulaiman, Centre of Foundation Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor Branch, Dengkil Campus, Selangor, Malaysia

     

     

References

L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets”, Information and Control, 1965, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 338-353. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X.

K. T. Atanassov, Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets: Theory and Application. New York: Physica-Verlag, 1999, pp. 1-324. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1870-3_1.

F. Smarandache, “A unifying field in logics: Neutrosophic logic". In Philosophy, American Research Press, 1999, pp. 1-141.

H. Wang, F. Smarandache, Y. Q. Zhang, and R. Sunderraman, “Interval neutrosophic sets and logic: Theory and applications in computing”. Hexis, Phoenix, USA, 2005.

H. Wang, F. Smarandache, Y. Q. Zhang, and R. Sunderraman, “Single valued neutrosophic sets”, Multisp Multistruct, 2010, vol. 4, pp.410–413.

S. Broumi, “Generalized Neutrosophic Soft Set”, International Journal of Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology (IJCSEIT), 2013, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 17 -30. doi: https://doi.org/10.5121/ijcseit.2013.3202.

S. Broumi, S., Smarandache, and M. Dhar, “Rough neutrosophic sets”, Infinite Study, 2014, vol. 32, pp. 493-502. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.30310.

J. Ye, “A multicriteria decision-making method using aggregation operators for simplified neutrosophic sets”, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 2014, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 2459–2466. doi: https://doi.org/10.3233/IFS-130916.

I. Deli, M. Ali, and F. Smarandache, “Bipolar neutrosophic sets and their application based on multi-criteria decision making problems”, In 2015 International conference on advanced mechatronic systems (ICAMechS), IEEE, August 2015, pp. 249-254. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAMechS.2015.7287068.

P. Ji, H. Y. Zhang, and J. Q. Wang, “A projection-based TODIM method under multi-valued neutrosophic environments and its application in personnel selection”, Neural Comput. & Applic., 2018, vol. 29, pp. 221–234. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2436-z.

J. J. Peng, J. Wang, and X. H. Wu, “An extension of the ELECTRE approach with multi-valued neutrosophic information”, Neural Comput. & Applic., 2017, vol. 28, pp. 1011-1022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2411-8.

J. Ye, “Trapezoidal neutrosophic set and its application to multiple attribute decision making”, Neural Comput. Appl., 2014, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1157–1166. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-014-1787-6.

I. Deli, and Y. Subas, Y, “Single valued neutrosophic numbers and their applications to multicriteria decision making problem”, Neutrosophic Sets Systems, 2014, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1-13.

P. Biswas, S. Pramanik, and B.C. Giri, “Value and ambiguity index based ranking method of single-valued trapezoidal neutrosophic numbers and its application to multi-attribute decision making”, Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 2016, vol. 12, pp. 127-138.

I. Deli and Y. Subas, “A ranking method of single valued neutrosophic numbers and its applications to multi-attribute decision making problems”, Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern, 2017, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1309–1322. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-016-0505-3.

S. I. A. Aal, M. M. Abd Ellatif, and M. M. Hassan, “Two ranking methods of single valued triangular neutrosophic numbers to rank and evaluate information systems quality”, Infinite Study, 2018.

I. Deli, “Operators on single valued trapezoidal neutrosophic numbers and SVTN-group decision making”, Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 2018, vol. 22, pp. 131-150.

P. Liu, and X. Zhang, “Some Maclaurin symmetric mean operators for single-valued trapezoidal neutrosophic numbers and their applications to group decision making”, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 2018, vol. 20, pp. 45-61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-017-0335-9.

S. Broumi, A. Bakali, M. Talea, F. Smarandache, and L. Vladareanu, “Computation of shortest path problem in a network with SV-trapezoidal neutrosophic numbers”, In 2016 International Conference on Advanced Mechatronic Systems (ICAMechS), IEEE, November 2016, pp. 417-422. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAMechS.2016.7813484.

I. Deli, “A novel defuzzification method of SV-trapezoidal neutrosophic numbers and multi-attribute decision making: A comparative analysis”, Soft Computing, 2019, vol. 23, no. 23, pp. 12529-12545. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-03803-z.

I. Deli, Theory of Single-Valued Trapezoidal Neutrosophic Numbers and their Applications to Multi Robot Systems. Toward Humanoid Robots: The Role of Fuzzy Sets. A Handbook on Theory and Applications, 2021, pp. 255-276. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67163-1_10 .

R. K. Saini, A. Sangal, and M. Manisha, “Application of single valued trapezoidal neutrosophic numbers in transportation problem”, Neutrosophic sets and systems, 2020, vol. 35, no. 33, pp. 563-583. doi: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3965004.

J. Ye, “Some weighted aggregation operators of trapezoidal neutrosophic numbers and their multiple attribute decision making method”, Informatica, 2017, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 387-402.

M. Abdel-Basset, M. Mohamed, and A. K. Sangaiah, “Neutrosophic AHP-Delphi Group decision making model based on trapezoidal neutrosophic numbers”, Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 2018, vol. 9, pp. 1427-1443. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-017-0548-7.

P. Biswas, S. Pramanik, and B.C. Giri, “TOPSIS strategy for multi-attribute decision making with trapezoidal neutrosophic numbers”, Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 2018, vol. 19, pp. 29-39. doi: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1235335.

S. Pramanik, and R. Mallick, “VIKOR based MAGDM strategy with trapezoidal neutrosophic numbers”, Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 2018, vol. 22, pp. 118-129. doi: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2160840.

D. Djatkov, E. Mathias and M. Milan, "Method for assessing and improving the efficiency of agricultural biogas plants based on fuzzy logic and expert systems", Applied energy, 2014, vol. 134, pp.163-175. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.08.021.

A. Ikpe, A. I. Ndon, and P. Etim, "Fuzzy modelling and optimization of anaerobic co-digestion process parameters for effective biogas yield from bio-wastes" The International Journal of Energy and Engineering Sciences, 2020, vol. 5, no.2, pp. 43-61.

V. Başhan, and A. Y. Çetinkaya. "Application fuzzy DEMATEL methodology to investigate some technical parameters of biochemical methane potential (BMP) test produced vegetable waste anaerobic biogas”, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2022, vol. 194, no. 661. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10330-2.

A. Rahimieh, M. Mehriar, S. M. Zamir, and M. Nosrati, "Fuzzy-decision tree modeling for H2S production management in an industrial-scale anaerobic digestion process”, Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2024, vol. 208, no. 109380. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2024.109380.

O. Olatunji, et al., "Evolutionary optimization of biogas production from food, fruit, and vegetable (FFV) waste", Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 2024, vol. 14, pp. 12113-12125. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-04506-0.

R. Selaman, D. Indim, R. Rasmidi, T. Mohamed, and A. Lepit, "Biogas recovery from different composition of food waste using anaerobic digestion technique", In APS Proceeding, 2023, vol. 8, pp. 37-42.

R. Selaman and T. P. Utomo, “The characterisation of protein-rich food waste and pond sludge for biomethane recovery”, Borneo Akademika, 2024, vol. 8, no. 1, pp 1-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.24191/BA/v8i1/114022.

A. Paranje, S. Saxena, and P. Jain, “A review in performance improvement of anaerobic digestion using co-digestion of food waste and sewage sludge”, Journal of Environment Management, 2023, vol. 338, Art. no. 117733. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117733.

S. Abd Hamid, N. Aini, and R. Selaman, “Anaerobic digestion of fruit wastes for biogas production”, IJARCCE, 2019, vol 5, no.4, pp. 34-38.

R. Kar, A. K. Shaw, and J. Mishra, “Trapezoidal fuzzy numbers (trfn) and its application in solving assignment problems by hungarian method: A new approach”, Fuzzy intelligent systems: methodologies, techniques, and applications, 2021, pp. 315-333. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119763437.ch11.

A. Abdillah, T. Hidaka, and T. Fujiwara, “Enhancing sludge stabilization and methane production in the anaerobic digestion of palm oil mill effluent using carbon conductive materials”, Journal of Materials Cycles and Waste Management, 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-025-02317-1.

S. Mohammad, S. Baidurah, T. Kobayashi, N. Ismail, and C. P. Leh, “Palm Oil Mill Effluent Treatment Processes—A Review”, Processes, 2021, vol. 9, no.5, Art. no.739. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9050739.

M. Suresh, K. Arun Prakash, and S. Vengataasalam, "Multi-criteria decision making based on ranking of neutrosophic trapezoidal fuzzy numbers”, Granular Computing, 2021, vol. 6, pp. 943-952. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-020-00240-4.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-27

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
“MCDM based on Trapezoidal Neutrosophic Numbers for Biogas Recovery Substrates Selection Problems”, Malaysian J. Sci. Adv. Tech., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 20–29, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.56532/mjsat.v6i1.538.